Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.89 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's score of 80.4. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is way thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a sharper display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels number in each inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher video resolution, a back facing camera with a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.