Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-07 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black Shadow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is notably thinner but extremely heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a lot lower display density, it also counts with a quite better 1968 x 2184 resolution and a much bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much greater processing power than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 38 percent more battery size. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Note Fan Edition. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy Note Fan Edition, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.