Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction has the same thickness than vivo X70 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels density.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor, faster video frame rate and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4450mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.