Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 82.2 score against 80.4. Xiaomi Mi 9T's body is newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Mi 9T's CPU is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's processor, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels density. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Xiaomi Mi 9T captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.