Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 82.7 score against 80.4. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a a lot newer phone than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit more storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has improved battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.