Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is notably older than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an 88 percent greater battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.