Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
HSPA+ OnlyN7100
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1 | Android 14 |
| 2012-08-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.44 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| $ 215.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 980 hours standby time 35 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note II's 74.8 general score. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a way newer and way thinner cellphone than Galaxy Note II, although it is somewhat heavier. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Galaxy Note II has Android 4.4.2.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note II, because it has a way larger screen, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note II has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note II, because it has an 84% larger battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a much higher video resolution and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy Note II, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Note II. So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy Note II, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.