Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
VerizonSCH-I605
Motorola Droid Turbo
32 GB| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2012-09-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 225.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has a general score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note II's global score of 72. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Droid Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while Galaxy Note II has Android 4.4.2 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Droid Turbo construction is noticeably newer and just a little lighter, but somewhat thicker than Galaxy Note II.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note II, because although it has a slower graphics processing unit running at 500 MHz, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with more RAM. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note II, because it has a way more megapixels back camera and a much higher video definition. The Galaxy Note II features a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 64 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola Droid Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.