Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a overall score of 86.2 against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the vivo X70 Pro. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Vivo X70 Pro features a screen that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's display, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much more mega pixels back camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Vivo X70 Pro's battery duration is very similar to the Galaxy Note10 Lite one, although the vivo X70 Pro has a 1 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.