Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2014-10-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6, having a general score of 89 against 81.1. The Galaxy Note10 design is much newer, a bit lighter and extremely thinner than the Google Nexus 6. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little better performance than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little better battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity. Galaxy Note10 has a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light situations.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Note10 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.