Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Galaxy Note10 is a just a little heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, but both have the same thickness. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The LG G7 Fit features a better display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures clearer photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a lot larger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.