Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 global score. Galaxy Note10's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's just a little lighter. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Note10 have very similar storage for apps and games, both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Note10 is also a bit cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.