Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-08-23 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 89 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body is way newer, thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy Note10 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy Note10 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note10 also has higher video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light environments.
Galaxy S7 Active features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.