Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note10's 89 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note10's, but it is also much heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Note10 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 feature very similar memory for apps and games, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a lot larger aperture for better low-light photos. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has improved battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.