Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than vivo X70 Pro, getting an 89 score against 78.3. The Galaxy Note10 body has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter. Galaxy Note10 and vivo X70 Pro count with incredibly similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display.
Vivo X70 Pro's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Galaxy Note10's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The vivo X70 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.