Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 15 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note3, having a 79.2 score against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the previous 15 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is heavier than the Galaxy Note3, it's notably thinner and also noticeably newer.
Galaxy Note3 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Galaxy Note3 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more MP camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.