Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a general score of 78.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note4's 77.6 general score. Vivo X70 Pro is a a lot newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy Note4, although it is a little heavier. Galaxy Note4 counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The vivo X70 Pro has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4450mAh battery size. Vivo X70 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments and a much more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.