Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2016-08-02 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, having an 82 score against 79.5. Apple iPhone XR's design is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note7. IPhone XR counts with a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 features just a bit better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much greater pixel density. Galaxy Note7 counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. The Apple iPhone XR shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.