Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note7's, although it is heavier and a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM and 4 less CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit worse pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera, better video frame rates and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.