Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, getting a 79.8 score against 79.5. Motorola One Hyper is a notably newer phone than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater display pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger number of cores. Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.