Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Galaxy Note7 is a just a bit lighter phone than vivo X70 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. Galaxy Note7 has a little more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of display.
Vivo X70 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 Pro has a superior CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and 8 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Vivo X70 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way better resolution back-facing camera, a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.