Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note8 is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a score of 83 against 78.3. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy Note8 is an extremely older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than vivo X70 Pro. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2960px resolution. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, better video frame rate and a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Note8, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.