Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 global score. Galaxy Note9 is a noticeably older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than OPPO Find X3 Pro. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels, a little higher pixels count per display inch and a quite larger screen. Galaxy Note9 features a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.