Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Galaxy On7 Prime, having an 89 score against 76.9. The Google Pixel 5 construction has the same thickness than Galaxy On7 Prime, but it's somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit greater pixel amount per screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy On7 Prime has a little bit more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 5 has a better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture, a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Google Pixel 5 has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.