Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, having a overall score of 81.3 against 76.9. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a little lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than Galaxy On7 Prime, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a little larger screen and a greater screen density. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light situations and a camera in the back with more MP.
The Galaxy On7 Prime and the LG V35 ThinQ feature really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.