Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2018-01-09 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a general score of 81.6 against 76.9. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's construction is a lot newer, but thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy On7 Prime. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a slightly better screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy On7 Prime and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC feature extremely similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a much more MP camera, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.