Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.3 | 30.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | PCD |
| -- | 2010-06-01 |
| -- | 3.80 x 1.90 x 0.80 inches |
| -- | 3.50 ounces |
| $ 290.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 2.2 inches |
| -- | 176 x 220 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 109 pixels per inch | 128 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 5.6 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 512 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.85 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
Comparison review
PCD CDM8635 has an overall score of 30.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Q's 28.3 general score. The PCD CDM8635 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Q, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels number per screen inch. The Galaxy Q and the PCD CDM8635 feature incredibly similar storage for apps and games.
PCD CDM8635 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Q. Both have the same number of cores. The PCD CDM8635 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Q. PCD CDM8635 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Q.
The PCD CDM8635 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.