Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.95 x 3.13 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Brown | Black, Gold and Gray |
| $ 95.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 370 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Round, with a 75.8 score against 73.2. Moto Z Force is a just a little bit heavier but just a little thinner device than Samsung Galaxy Round. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version and Samsung Galaxy Round has Android 4.3 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Round has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Round also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Galaxy Round counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way worse pixels amount per inch in the display and a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy Round, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Round. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Moto Z Force, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy Round, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.