Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 2.3.6 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-01-30 | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.85 x 2.48 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 570 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the Galaxy S Advance's 60.4 score. LG V50 ThinQ is a way newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Galaxy S Advance, but it is also extremely heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Galaxy S Advance has Android 4.1.2 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S Advance, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 5,25 GB more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Galaxy S Advance, because it has a way bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way better pixels density.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S Advance, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S Advance, because it has a much bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments, a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S Advance, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.