Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S
GT-I9000| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 2.3.5, 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2010-03-23 | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.82 x 2.53 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 13.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than Galaxy S, having an 83.7 score against 58.2. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is a lot heavier than the Galaxy S, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Galaxy S has Android 2.3.5.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy S, because it has a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a lot better pixel count per inch in the display and a much bigger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S, because it has a larger number of cores and 5,5 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better 12 mega pixels resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S, because it has a 167% bigger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs a little more than the Galaxy S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.