Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 2.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-08-28 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 305.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 207 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, getting a 79.7 score against 66. The Moto G Stylus is a incredibly newer and just a bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, although it is incredibly heavier. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Moto G Stylus has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S II LTE has Android 2.3, so it provides lots of additional features.
Moto G Stylus counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a really bigger display, a way higher pixels amount per display inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2300. The Moto G Stylus counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 112 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior CPU than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Moto G Stylus takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Moto G Stylus features a much better battery life than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Moto G Stylus is also cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.