Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-01-10 | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM28155 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (400 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| VideoCore-IV GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 350 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S II Plus's 61.2 overall score. LG V50 ThinQ is a a lot heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S II Plus has Android 4.1.2 version.
LG V50 ThinQ features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy S II Plus, because it has a really larger display, a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a much higher display density. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S II Plus, because it has 120 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S II Plus, because it has 6 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S II Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1650mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S II Plus, because it has a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs, a lot better resolution camera and a much higher (4K) video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.