Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Polycarbonate | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T's general score of 72.2. The Moto G200 5G design is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it's incredibly heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit sharper screen than Moto G200 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, a much smaller display and a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution. The Moto G200 5G has much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Moto G200 5G has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and 6 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture, a camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Moto G200 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.