Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2012-06-04 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy S III AT&T's global score of 72.2. Motorola Moto Z Force's construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it's heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3.
Moto Z Force has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a little bigger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way higher quantity of pixels per display inch. Moto Z Force has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Moto Z Force features a superior camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot larger diafragm aperture. The Moto Z Force has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
Moto Z Force features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto Z Force is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.