Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. The Motorola One Hyper is a a lot newer cellphone than Galaxy S III AT&T, although it is a bit thicker and notably heavier. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3.
Motorola One Hyper features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720, a little bit worse pixel amount in each inch of display and a really smaller display.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Motorola One Hyper takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot larger camera aperture for better low light photography and video, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola One Hyper is also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.