Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 67.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.0 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-07-13 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.72 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 295 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has a global score of 71.5, which is a little bit better than the LG Fortune 3's global score of 67.2. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has the older 4.0 version and LG Fortune 3 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S III Cricket body has the same thickness than the LG Fortune 3, but it is a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a better looking display than LG Fortune 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel quantity in each inch in the display. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a much better storage for apps and games than LG Fortune 3, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB.
LG Fortune 3 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the LG Fortune 3 also counts with 6 more cpu cores. LG Fortune 3 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
The LG Fortune 3 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a 0.33 inches sensor, the LG Fortune 3 also has a camera with way more MP and a way larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy S III Cricket and the LG Fortune 3 cost exactly the same, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.