Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is better than LG K62, with a score of 93.6 against 78.2. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version. Even though the Galaxy S10 5G is older and just a bit heavier than the LG K62, it's design is still a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better display than LG K62, because it has a much greater count of pixels per screen inch, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a quite bigger display. Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior processor than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better camera than LG K62, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a way better (4K) video definition.
LG K62 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior battery duration than LG K62, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.