Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a score of 93.6 against 81.3. Galaxy S10 5G is a newer device than LG V35 ThinQ, but it's just a bit thicker and notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and LG V35 ThinQ both feature quite similar CPUs, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality photos and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 5G counts with better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S10 5G is more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.