Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a better cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ, it must be told that it is also heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a processing unit that's very similar to Galaxy S10 5G's CPU, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a camera that is very similar to Galaxy S10 5G's camera, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, they both have a camera in the back with a 12 MP, a F1.5 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates.
The Galaxy S10 5G has better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36% bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.