Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and a performance increase. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 5G has a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.