Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, with a global score of 93.6 against 78.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body is just a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M20, and they were released with only a couple of months difference.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because it has a quite larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a little greater screen pixels density.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, a lot better (4K) video definition and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.