Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than vivo X70 Pro, with a 93.6 score against 78.3. Galaxy S10 5G is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but they are 0.31inches thick. These devices have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user all the same operating system features.
Vivo X70 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a higher pixel count in each inch in the display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a little bit bigger screen.
The vivo X70 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Vivo X70 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S10 5G count with incredibly similar memory for games and applications, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. Vivo X70 Pro's battery life is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy S10 5G, although the vivo X70 Pro has a 1 percent lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.