Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's global score of 81.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S10 5G design is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it was released around 16 months before.
Galaxy S10 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot better 64 MP resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 15 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.