Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-02-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is better than Google Pixel's 80.2 general score. Galaxy S10 Lite's design is much newer and just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel's, but it is also notably heavier. Google Pixel counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the display.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S10 Lite has much more storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2770mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and higher video frame rates.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.