Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2020-02-03 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the HTC U Ultra, with an 89.7 score against 77. Galaxy S10 Lite's design is incredibly newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.