Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Mirror black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 279.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than LG Q70, having an 89.7 score against 77.9. The Galaxy S10 Lite design has the same thickness than LG Q70, but it's just a little lighter. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than LG Q70, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little bit longer battery life than LG Q70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior camera than LG Q70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and better video frame rates.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.