Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with an 89.7 score against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design is much older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a little bit higher pixel number in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a back camera with a higher resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.