Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a overall score of 89.7 against 75.8. Galaxy S10 Lite's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were only released with a couple of months difference. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's screen, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit lower display density, they both have a screen of the same size.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a 48 MP back-facing camera and the same sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features more storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.