Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than the Galaxy S10e, getting a global score of 89.7 against 86.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is newer than the Galaxy S10e, it's just a little thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a processor that is just as good as the processor in Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10e has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.