Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design is extremely lighter and much thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy S10 Lite has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite have very similar batteries duration. The Galaxy S10 Lite shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.